[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190222192959.241499-1-oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:29:58 +0200
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] habanalabs: don't print result when rc indicates error
send_cpu_message() doesn't update the result parameter when an error
occurs in its code. Therefore, callers of send_cpu_message() shouldn't use
the result value when the return code indicates error.
This patch fixes a static checker warning in goya_test_cpu_queue(), where
that function did print the result even though the return code from
send_cpu_message() indicated error.
Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>
---
drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c
index c43bd37fe693..e6f0d49ab71a 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/habanalabs/goya/goya.c
@@ -3380,10 +3380,16 @@ int goya_test_cpu_queue(struct hl_device *hdev)
rc = hdev->asic_funcs->send_cpu_message(hdev, (u32 *) &test_pkt,
sizeof(test_pkt), HL_DEVICE_TIMEOUT_USEC, &result);
- if (!rc)
- dev_info(hdev->dev, "queue test on CPU queue succeeded\n");
- else
- dev_err(hdev->dev, "CPU queue test failed (0x%08lX)\n", result);
+ if (!rc) {
+ if (result == ARMCP_PACKET_FENCE_VAL)
+ dev_info(hdev->dev,
+ "queue test on CPU queue succeeded\n");
+ else
+ dev_err(hdev->dev,
+ "CPU queue test failed (0x%08lX)\n", result);
+ } else {
+ dev_err(hdev->dev, "CPU queue test failed, error %d\n", rc);
+ }
return rc;
}
--
2.18.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists