[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ad5f897-25c0-90cf-f54f-827876873a0a@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:54:51 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Lee Smith <Lee.Smith@....com>,
Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@....com>,
Jacob Bramley <Jacob.Bramley@....com>,
Ruben Ayrapetyan <Ruben.Ayrapetyan@....com>,
Chintan Pandya <cpandya@...eaurora.org>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel
On 2/22/19 4:53 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> The following testing approaches has been taken to find potential issues
> with user pointer untagging:
>
> 1. Static testing (with sparse [3] and separately with a custom static
> analyzer based on Clang) to track casts of __user pointers to integer
> types to find places where untagging needs to be done.
First of all, it's really cool that you took this approach. Sounds like
there was a lot of systematic work to fix up the sites in the existing
codebase.
But, isn't this a _bit_ fragile going forward? Folks can't just "make
sparse" to find issues with missing untags. This seems like something
where we would ideally add an __tagged annotation (or something) to the
source tree and then have sparse rules that can look for missed untags.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists