| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgZCuKJ2RzTY-D5TduU3OLUFqGSmW6N5uLAXdkVjbrGag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:21:34 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Saint-Etienne <eric.saint.etienne@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@...cle.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf machine: add inline symbols to callchains
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 1:07 AM Jonas Rabenstein
<jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
>
> Use map__inlines to resolve inlined functions for every entry with
> an symbol that should be added to a callchain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@...dium.uni-erlangen.de>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/machine.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> index dce29c21e4ea..070d074482b4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> @@ -1908,6 +1908,91 @@ struct iterations {
> u64 cycles;
> };
>
> +static int __add_callchain_location(struct callchain_cursor *cursor,
> + struct symbol **parent,
> + struct addr_location *root_al,
> + u64 addr, struct addr_location *al,
> + bool branch, struct branch_flags *flags,
> + u64 branch_from, struct iterations *iter)
> +{
> + int nr_loop_iter = 0;
> + u64 iter_cycles = 0;
> +
> + if (symbol_conf.hide_unresolved && al->sym == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (al->sym) {
> + if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent &&
> + symbol__match_regex(al->sym, &parent_regex))
> + *parent = al->sym;
> + else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al &&
> + symbol__match_regex(al->sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) {
> + /* Treat this symbol as the root,
> + forgetting its callees. */
> + *root_al = *al;
> + callchain_cursor_reset(cursor);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (iter) {
> + nr_loop_iter = iter->nr_loop_iter;
> + iter_cycles = iter->cycles;
> + }
> + return callchain_cursor_append(cursor, addr, al->map, al->sym, branch,
> + flags, nr_loop_iter, iter_cycles,
> + branch_from, al->srcline);
> +}
> +
> +static int __add_callchain_ip(struct callchain_cursor *cursor, u64 ip,
> + struct addr_location *al, bool branch,
> + struct branch_flags *flags, u64 branch_from,
> + struct iterations *iter, struct symbol **parent,
> + struct addr_location *root_al)
> +{
> + struct inline_node *inline_node;
> + struct inline_list *inline_list;
> + const char *srcline;
> + struct symbol *symbol;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + al->srcline = callchain_srcline(al->map, al->sym, al->addr);
> + if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLER)
> + err = __add_callchain_location(cursor, parent, root_al, ip, al,
> + branch, flags, branch_from, iter);
> + if (err || !al->map || !al->sym)
> + goto no_inline;
> +
> + inline_node = map__inlines(al->map, ip, al->sym);
> + if (!inline_node || list_empty(&inline_node->val))
> + goto no_inline;
> +
> + symbol = al->sym;
> + srcline = al->srcline;
> + list_for_each_entry(inline_list, &inline_node->val, list) {
> + if (inline_list->symbol == symbol)
> + continue;
> + al->sym = inline_list->symbol;
> + al->srcline = inline_list->srcline;
> + err = __add_callchain_location(cursor, parent, root_al, ip,
> + al, branch, flags,
> + branch_from, iter);
> + if (err)
> + break;
> + }
Does this loop do the job both for ORDER_CALLER and ORDER_CALLEE?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> +
> + if (callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE) {
> + al->srcline = srcline;
> + al->sym = symbol;
> + }
> +
> +no_inline:
> + if (!err && callchain_param.order == ORDER_CALLEE)
> + err = __add_callchain_location(cursor, parent, root_al, ip, al,
> + branch, flags, branch_from, iter);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +
> static int add_callchain_ip(struct thread *thread,
> struct callchain_cursor *cursor,
> struct symbol **parent,
> @@ -1920,9 +2005,6 @@ static int add_callchain_ip(struct thread *thread,
> u64 branch_from)
> {
> struct addr_location al;
> - int nr_loop_iter = 0;
> - u64 iter_cycles = 0;
> - const char *srcline = NULL;
>
> al.filtered = 0;
> al.sym = NULL;
> @@ -1955,31 +2037,8 @@ static int add_callchain_ip(struct thread *thread,
> thread__find_symbol(thread, *cpumode, ip, &al);
> }
>
> - if (al.sym != NULL) {
> - if (perf_hpp_list.parent && !*parent &&
> - symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &parent_regex))
> - *parent = al.sym;
> - else if (have_ignore_callees && root_al &&
> - symbol__match_regex(al.sym, &ignore_callees_regex)) {
> - /* Treat this symbol as the root,
> - forgetting its callees. */
> - *root_al = al;
> - callchain_cursor_reset(cursor);
> - }
> - }
> -
> - if (symbol_conf.hide_unresolved && al.sym == NULL)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (iter) {
> - nr_loop_iter = iter->nr_loop_iter;
> - iter_cycles = iter->cycles;
> - }
> -
> - srcline = callchain_srcline(al.map, al.sym, al.addr);
> - return callchain_cursor_append(cursor, ip, al.map, al.sym,
> - branch, flags, nr_loop_iter,
> - iter_cycles, branch_from, srcline);
> + return __add_callchain_ip(cursor, ip, &al, branch, flags, branch_from,
> + iter, parent, root_al);
> }
>
> struct branch_info *sample__resolve_bstack(struct perf_sample *sample,
> --
> 2.19.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists