lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9bd0756-2824-a2c2-24ad-a69dc41d9ac3@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 24 Feb 2019 08:17:16 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "open list:DPAA2 ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Add missing netdevice
 check

Le 2/23/19 à 12:45 AM, Ioana Ciornei a écrit :
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH net] staging: fsl-dpaa2: ethsw: Add missing netdevice check
>>
>> port_switchdev_event() does not check that the target network device is
>> actually backed by the ethsw driver, this could be problematic in a stacked
>> environment case.
>>
> 
> Just FYI, I sent a patch set containing a similar patch verifying if the netdev is backed by the ethsw:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/6/216
> 
> I sent the entire patch set against the staging tree.

Thank you. BTW do you have any plans for moving this driver out of
staging? It looks pretty good to me to get promoted in tree, provided
that you also have all the dependencies in place etc.
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ