[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB280056BBF62A86E1703C549BE07A0@VI1PR0402MB2800.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 07:00:28 +0000
From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu <ruxandra.radulescu@....com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
"brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
>
> From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:48:42 +0000
>
> > The first two patches enable cache stashing and configure the core
> > cluster destination per software portal while the third patch is the
> > one configuring the amount of stashing on a queue.
>
> Should I merge this series in via my networking tree?
Even though it would be really good to have this on the networking tree as soon as possible, I am afraid that patch 2/3 is not going to apply cleanly because it touches the same areas of code that some other patches on Leo's tree are.
Thanks,
Ioana C
Powered by blists - more mailing lists