linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGUNXRS_DOMZ_G=JtEvZgfPMYrR_gbeoTGMEAjodVZ+AthP1FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:46:41 +0000
From:   Chris Spencer <spencercw@...il.com>
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...ux.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Add generic i.MX8 SoC driver

On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 09:31, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com> wrote:
> I don't get it, in the RFC you said you didn't have the boards to test.
> How did you test it then ?

I have the i.MX8MQ-EVK. I have tested it on that, but I can't test it
on anything else using that driver (i.MX6, Layerscape).

> The SoC driver needs a little bit of rework because of the way the
> revisions are detected. I'll resend this in the next couple of days.

Ok thanks.

Chris