[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190225113003.GE26145@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:30:03 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, bhe@...hat.com,
Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, yinghai@...nel.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7] x86/kdump: bugfix, make the behavior of crashkernel=X
consistent with kaslr
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:12:16PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> If we move to high as default, it will allocate 160M high + 256M low. It
We won't move to high by default - we will *fall* back to high if the
default allocation fails.
> To make the process less fragile maybe we can remove the 896M limitation
> and only try <4G then go to high.
Sure, the more robust for the user, the better.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists