lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:12:46 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
        Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/20] m68k: io: Remove useless definition of mmiowb()

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:25:52AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 7:51 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> > m68k includes asm-generic/io.h, which provides a dummy definition of
> > mmiowb() if one isn't already provided by the architecture.
> >
> > Remove the useless definition.
> >
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> Thanks!
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> 
> Do you want me to queue this in the m68k tree for v5.2, or would
> you prefer to apply the whole series?
> In case of the latter:
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>

Cheers, Geert! For now, I think it's best to keep all the patches together
since I anticipate a few rounds of rework before I have a good idea about
what the final series will look like.

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ