linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac4bd28e-6ba9-2da7-7bdf-8f11bee83bd2@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:13:23 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        jhogan@...nel.org
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

05.02.2019 14:16, Sameer Pujar пишет:
> Drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for managing clocks
> and power explicitly, which is not really necessary when PM support on
> tegra is in good shape. In fact ARM 64-bit tegra platforms enforce PM

Tegra

> support and there is no reason why this cannot be done for 32-bit.
> 
> This patch selects PM unconditionally and drivers can rely on runtime
> PM framework for clock and power management.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---

You probably should explain in the commit message what driver need this right now and why.