linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf record: implement -z=<level> and --mmap-flush=<thres> options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:26:49 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] perf record: implement -z=<level> and
 --mmap-flush=<thres> options


On 21.02.2019 14:23, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> 
> On 21.02.2019 12:47, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 05:15:13PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12.02.2019 16:08, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:22:38PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> SNIP
>>>>
>>>>> -	if (rec->opts.nr_cblocks > nr_cblocks_max)
>>>>> -		rec->opts.nr_cblocks = nr_cblocks_max;
>>>>> -	if (verbose > 0)
>>>>> -		pr_info("nr_cblocks: %d\n", rec->opts.nr_cblocks);
>>>>> +	if (rec->opts.comp_level > 22)
>>>>> +		rec->opts.comp_level = 0;
>>>>> +	if (record__comp_enabled(rec) && !rec->opts.nr_cblocks) {
>>>>> +		 /*
>>>>> +		  * Allocate aio.data[0] buffer for compression.
>>>>> +		  */
>>>>> +		rec->opts.nr_cblocks = -1;
>>>>> +	}
>>>>
>>>> I assume you're using aio.data[0] as a buffer for non-aio case
>>>> as compression buffer.. if that's the case, please dont do that
>>>> and use separate buffer for that
>>>
>>> Do you want it to be one more field in the mmap struct or 
>>> aio related fields still could be reworked?
>>
>> I dont like it to use aio buffers if it's generic feature,
>> so please add new pointer for the needed buffer
> 
> Ok.

Addressed.

> 
> Thanks,
> Alexey
> 
>>
>> jirka
>>
>