[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190225155119.GA7654@latitude>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:51:19 +0100
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] div64.h: Fix description of do_div parameter
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:19:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
> <j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:
> > Contrary to the description, the first parameter (n) should not be
> > passed as a pointer, but directly as an lvalue. This is possible because
> > do_div is a macro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
> Shouldn't the "semantics" at the top of include/asm-generic/div64.h be
> updated, too?
Arguably, it's semantically close enough. I'm not sure.
> As this can't be expressed in a C function, perhaps that should be done
> using C++ syntax, like
>
> uint32_t do_div(uint64_t &n, uint32_t base)
> {
> ...
> }
That might confuse some people who aren't expecting C++ syntax.
I'll leave this as is, because I can't decide wether this is an
improvement.
Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists