[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1551111016.31902.149.camel@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:10:16 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@...lanox.com>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux NVMe Mailinglist <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: disable direct I/O when unavailable
On Mon, 2019-02-25 at 16:38 +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:49:04AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 2/25/19 1:37 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > > On 24/02/2019 11:54, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> > > > What is the status of iSCSI/SRP targets in this case ?
> > >
> > > iSCSI/SRP passes in the following:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Use O_DSYNC by default instead of O_SYNC to forgo syncing
> > > * of pure timestamp updates.
> > > */
> > > flags = O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_LARGEFILE | O_DSYNC;
> >
> > That code fragment comes from the LIO file backend. There is no requirement
> > for a SCSI target core file backend to use O_DSYNC. SCST allows users to
> > choose whether or not O_DSYNC should be used:
>
> Yes, LIO file backend is the in-tree equivalent to NVMe's file backend. That's
> why I copied it here.
>
>
> >
> > if (virt_dev->wt_flag && !virt_dev->nv_cache)
> > open_flags |= O_DSYNC;
> >
>
> OK. Do your open_flags include O_DIRECT per default as well?
I don't think it has ever been supported to pass O_DIRECT to filp_open().
As one can see in build_open_flags() O_DIRECT is ignored. The only way I
know of to submit direct I/O from kernel context is by setting the
IOCB_DIRECT flag.
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists