[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVG6Da0FkTWr-dvPXAS3KGBTM_SqvDeH634Emd9Q_xa4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 08:50:37 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, valentin.schneider@....com,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/uaccess: Dont evaluate argument inside AC region
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:37 AM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:43:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > I put a slightly fancier version here last night so that the 0day bot
> > could chew on it:
>
> I'm guessing 0day bot didn't complain so far? Or should we give it one
> more day?
>
No complaints yet. I'll holler if it complains. This one patch could
plausibly be -stable or 5.0 material, I suppose.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists