lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:11:57 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>,
        Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 125/152] ARC: define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN = 8

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>

commit b6835ea77729e7faf4656ca637ba53f42b8ee3fd upstream.

The default value of ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN in "include/linux/slab.h" is
"__alignof__(unsigned long long)" which for ARC unexpectedly turns out
to be 4. This is not a compiler bug, but as defined by ARC ABI [1]

Thus slab allocator would allocate a struct which is 32-bit aligned,
which is generally OK even if struct has long long members.
There was however potetial problem when it had any atomic64_t which
use LLOCKD/SCONDD instructions which are required by ISA to take
64-bit addresses. This is the problem we ran into

[    4.015732] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p2): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
[    4.167881] Misaligned Access
[    4.172356] Path: /bin/busybox.nosuid
[    4.176004] CPU: 2 PID: 171 Comm: rm Not tainted 4.19.14-yocto-standard #1
[    4.182851]
[    4.182851] [ECR   ]: 0x000d0000 => Check Programmer's Manual
[    4.190061] [EFA   ]: 0xbeaec3fc
[    4.190061] [BLINK ]: ext4_delete_entry+0x210/0x234
[    4.190061] [ERET  ]: ext4_delete_entry+0x13e/0x234
[    4.202985] [STAT32]: 0x80080002 : IE K
[    4.207236] BTA: 0x9009329c   SP: 0xbe5b1ec4  FP: 0x00000000
[    4.212790] LPS: 0x9074b118  LPE: 0x9074b120 LPC: 0x00000000
[    4.218348] r00: 0x00000040  r01: 0x00000021 r02: 0x00000001
...
...
[    4.270510] Stack Trace:
[    4.274510]   ext4_delete_entry+0x13e/0x234
[    4.278695]   ext4_rmdir+0xe0/0x238
[    4.282187]   vfs_rmdir+0x50/0xf0
[    4.285492]   do_rmdir+0x9e/0x154
[    4.288802]   EV_Trap+0x110/0x114

The fix is to make sure slab allocations are 64-bit aligned.

Do note that atomic64_t is __attribute__((aligned(8)) which means gcc
does generate 64-bit aligned references, relative to beginning of
container struct. However the issue is if the container itself is not
64-bit aligned, atomic64_t ends up unaligned which is what this patch
ensures.

[1] https://github.com/foss-for-synopsys-dwc-arc-processors/toolchain/wiki/files/ARCv2_ABI.pdf

Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.8+
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
[vgupta: reworked changelog, added dependency on LL64+LLSC]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h |   11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -52,6 +52,17 @@
 #define cache_line_size()	SMP_CACHE_BYTES
 #define ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN	SMP_CACHE_BYTES
 
+/*
+ * Make sure slab-allocated buffers are 64-bit aligned when atomic64_t uses
+ * ARCv2 64-bit atomics (LLOCKD/SCONDD). This guarantess runtime 64-bit
+ * alignment for any atomic64_t embedded in buffer.
+ * Default ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is __alignof__(long long) which has a relaxed
+ * value of 4 (and not 8) in ARC ABI.
+ */
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LL64) && defined(CONFIG_ARC_HAS_LLSC)
+#define ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN	8
+#endif
+
 extern void arc_cache_init(void);
 extern char *arc_cache_mumbojumbo(int cpu_id, char *buf, int len);
 extern void read_decode_cache_bcr(void);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists