[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190225174248.54aceebd@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:42:48 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the powerpc
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
between commit:
c8e409a33cf8 ("powerpc/irq: use memblock functions returning virtual address")
and other patches in the powerpc tree
from the powerpc tree and patch:
"powerpc: use memblock functions returning virtual address"
from the akpm-current tree.
This file looks the same after applying either of those patches, so I
just used the powerpc version of the file due to the other changes.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
The akpm patch now looks like this:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
index e49bd5efcfe6..28c076c771de 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -810,7 +810,6 @@ static int __init process_cpufeatures_node(unsigned long node,
int len;
f = &dt_cpu_features[i];
- memset(f, 0, sizeof(struct dt_cpu_feature));
f->node = node;
@@ -1005,7 +1004,7 @@ static int __init dt_cpu_ftrs_scan_callback(unsigned long node, const char
/* Count and allocate space for cpu features */
of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes(node, count_cpufeatures_subnodes,
&nr_dt_cpu_features);
- dt_cpu_features = __va(memblock_phys_alloc(sizeof(struct dt_cpu_feature) * nr_dt_cpu_features, PAGE_SIZE));
+ dt_cpu_features = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct dt_cpu_feature) * nr_dt_cpu_features, PAGE_SIZE);
cpufeatures_setup_start(isa);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
index 8c890c6557ed..e7382abee868 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/paca.c
@@ -196,7 +196,11 @@ void __init allocate_paca_ptrs(void)
paca_nr_cpu_ids = nr_cpu_ids;
paca_ptrs_size = sizeof(struct paca_struct *) * nr_cpu_ids;
- paca_ptrs = __va(memblock_phys_alloc(paca_ptrs_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES));
+ paca_ptrs = memblock_alloc_raw(paca_ptrs_size, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+ if (!paca_ptrs)
+ panic("Failed to allocate %d bytes for paca pointers\n",
+ paca_ptrs_size);
+
memset(paca_ptrs, 0x88, paca_ptrs_size);
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
index e97aaf201d67..c0ed4fa0b9d3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
@@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ static void __init move_device_tree(void)
if ((memory_limit && (start + size) > PHYSICAL_START + memory_limit) ||
!memblock_is_memory(start + size - 1) ||
overlaps_crashkernel(start, size) || overlaps_initrd(start, size)) {
- p = __va(memblock_phys_alloc(size, PAGE_SIZE));
+ p = memblock_alloc_raw(size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!p)
+ panic("Failed to allocate %lu bytes to move device tree\n",
+ size);
memcpy(p, initial_boot_params, size);
initial_boot_params = p;
DBG("Moved device tree to 0x%px\n", p);
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists