[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226104653.GB14836@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:46:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/KASLR: skip the specified crashkernel reserved
region
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:08:42AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> I follow Baoquan's opinion. Due to the randomness caused by KASLR, a
> user may be surprised to find crashkernel=x@y not working sometime.
And she/he will get told in dmesg that the allocation failed.
> If kernel can help them out of this corner automatically, then no
> need to bother them with the message to use alternative method
> crashkernel=M. Anyway it is a cheap method already used by other
> options like hugepages and memmap in handle_mem_options().
> If commitment, then do it without failure. Or just removing
> crashkernel=x@y option on x86.
I can't parse what you're trying to say here but let me repeat myself:
specifying a crashkernel region should not have an influence on KASLR
because this way you limit the kernel where it selects the offset. It
should be other other way around: KASLR offset should be selected and
*then* crashkernel region.
IOW, KASLR offset selection needs to have higher priority than
crashkernel region selection.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists