[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226002904.GE6474@magnolia>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:29:04 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matej Kupljen <matej.kupljen@...il.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: fix uninitialized return value in shmem_link
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 04:07:12PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 4:03 PM Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
> > >
> > > Of course, that's just gcc. I have no idea what llvm ends up doing.
> >
> > Clang 7.0:
> >
> > # clang -O2 -S -Wall /tmp/test.c
> > /tmp/test.c:46:6: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if'
> > condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>
> Ok, good.
>
> Do we have any clang builds in any of the zero-day robot
> infrastructure or something? Should we?
>
> And maybe this was how Dan noticed the problem in the first place? Or
> is it just because of his eagle-eyes?
He didn't say specifically how he found it, but I would guess he was
running smatch...?
--D
> Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists