[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190226115618.GB4094@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:56:18 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
Cc: sudeep.dutt@...el.com, ashutosh.dixit@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Vincent Whitchurch <rabinv@...s.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 char-misc-next 4/7] mic: vop: Add loopback driver
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 04:30:52PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> Add a loopback driver to allow testing and evaluation of the VOP
> framework without special hardware. The host and the guest will run
> under the same kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/mic/Kconfig | 10 +
> drivers/misc/mic/vop/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_loopback.c | 382 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 394 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_loopback.c
You sent 2 4/7 patches in this series, is that intentional? Are they
different?
I've applied the first 3 here, can you rebase and resend the rest of
these, without any duplicated patches?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists