[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9725bf2a-55b7-5378-8d9a-a13983391b95@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 04:37:44 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Daniel Vacek <neelx@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] mm/memblock: make full utilization of numa info
On 2/25/19 9:40 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>> This doesn't get used until patch 6 as far as I can tell. Was there a
>> reason to define it here?
>>
> Yes, it gets used until patch 6. Patch 6 has two groups of
> pre-requirements [1-2] and [3-5]. Do you think reorder the patches and
> moving [3-5] ahead of [1-2] is a better choice?
I'd rather that you just introduce the code along with its first user.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists