[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTtYp5mV0xmt4ZJbS0igBFe8S1ZbUnuTWE1-wj8CuHPJew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:08:42 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot/KASLR: skip the specified crashkernel reserved region
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 5:45 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 03:59:56PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > crashkernel=x@y option may fail to reserve the required memory region if
> > KASLR puts kernel into the region. To avoid this uncertainty, making KASLR
> > skip the required region.
>
> Lemme see if I understand this correctly: supplying crashkernel=X@Y
> influences where KASLR would put the randomized kernel. And it should be
Yes, you get it.
> the other way around, IMHO. crashkernel= will have to "work" with KASLR
> to find a suitable range and if the reservation at Y fails, then we tell
> the user to try the more relaxed variant crashkernel=M.
>
I follow Baoquan's opinion. Due to the randomness caused by KASLR, a
user may be surprised to find crashkernel=x@y not working sometime. If
kernel can help them out of this corner automatically, then no need to
bother them with the message to use alternative method crashkernel=M.
Anyway it is a cheap method already used by other options like
hugepages and memmap in handle_mem_options().
If commitment, then do it without failure. Or just removing
crashkernel=x@y option on x86.
Thanks and regards,
Pingfan
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists