linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/63] 4.9.161-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190226174109.GA8682@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:41:09 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/63] 4.9.161-stable review

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.161 release.
> There are 63 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed Feb 27 19:50:06 UTC 2019.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
Build results:
	total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
Failed builds: 
	powerpc:defconfig 
	powerpc:ppc6xx_defconfig
Qemu test results:
	total: 315 pass: 315 fail: 0

Same build error as with v4.4.y, plus:

arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function ‘dlpar_memory’:
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:782:9: error:
	‘rc’ may be used uninitialized in this function

which I completely fail to understand. It doesn't seeem to affect
any other kernel version, and it looks like it is another compiler bug.
I'll see if I can find out how to avoid it (other than reverting
to an older version of gcc). Not a concern for now.

Guenter