linux-kernel - Re: SEV Command Privilege Separation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4db2f309-237f-240d-e7f7-290391274237@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:18:53 +0000
From:   "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
To:     Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: SEV Command Privilege Separation



On 2/14/19 3:08 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> I've been working on wrapping various SEV kernel APIs for userspace
> consumption. There does not appear to be any privilege separation for
> these commands: you can run them all or none of them. This is less
> than ideal because it means that a compromise of the code which
> launches VMs could make permanent changes to the SEV certificate
> chain.
> 
> These commands are required to attest the VM environment:
>    SEV_PDH_CERT_EXPORT
>    SEV_PLATFORM_STATUS
>    SEV_GET_ID
> 
> These commands manage the SEV certificate chain:
>    SEV_PEK_CERT_IMPORT
>    SEV_FACTORY_RESET
>    SEV_PEK_GEN
>    SEV_PEK_CSR
>    SEV_PDH_GEN
> 
> I would expect the first group of commands to be able to be called by
> whatever actor launches VMs. The latter group of commands should be
> able to be called by whatever actor manages the SEV environment.
> 
> I don't have strong opinions on how this privilege separation should
> happen. It might be sufficient to distinguish these based on the mode
> of the open() call. This could then be managed with filesystem
> permissions. But I'm open to other ideas.
> 


We had somewhat a similar discussion on libvirt ML, currently the
udev rules for the /dev/sev is 0600. As you have noticed there
is no privilege separation, if admin grants 0644 then user/group
will able to issue a command which can modify  the SEV certificate
chain. At the very minimal we should perform the mode check
before issuing the commands to PSP. If user does not have 'write'
access then any commands which modifies the cert-chain should
fail. Its in my TODO list, the patches are always welcome :)

-Brijesh