[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1lg22b9ri.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:00:17 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
SCSI <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
Joao Pinto <jpinto@...opsys.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@....com>,
Stanislav Nijnikov <stanislav.nijnikov@....com>,
Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@....com>,
Ohad Sharabi <ohad.sharabi@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Kyuho Choi <kyuho.choi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] scsi: ufs: Do not disable vccq in UFSHC driver
Marc,
> The resolution is simple: we keep the HEAD version, and simply remove
> ufshcd_set_vccq_rail_unused() and its error-handling.
>
>
> Is that the information you were after?
Yes.
> Do you prefer the patch subject to be:
> Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device"
> instead of:
> scsi: ufs: Do not disable vccq in UFSHC driver
>
> And I should leave in the automatically added
> This reverts commit 60f0187031c05e04cbadffb62f557d0ff3564490.
> while adding some information from the manual resolution?
Exactly.
Thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists