[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190226.123148.2025630912555867905.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:31:48 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: leoyang.li@....com
Cc: ioana.ciornei@....com, roy.pledge@....com,
ruxandra.radulescu@....com, laurentiu.tudor@....com,
horia.geanta@....com, brouer@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 13:03:17 -0600
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com> wrote:
>>
>> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] soc: fsl: dpio: enable and configure cache stashing
>> >
>> > From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
>> > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 08:48:42 +0000
>> >
>> > > The first two patches enable cache stashing and configure the core
>> > > cluster destination per software portal while the third patch is the
>> > > one configuring the amount of stashing on a queue.
>> >
>> > Should I merge this series in via my networking tree?
>>
>> Even though it would be really good to have this on the networking tree as soon as possible, I am afraid that patch 2/3 is not going to apply cleanly because it touches the same areas of code that some other patches on Leo's tree are.
>
> Hi David,
>
> What shall we do if we want to get this in the 5.1? Since the change
> on the ethernet driver is pretty small, can I get your ACK on that
> patch and merge the series through my tree?
Sure.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists