lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a3af95a-6e08-01fa-e4ef-07c1c1b6db69@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Feb 2019 23:35:44 +0000
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>, hch@....de,
        m.szyprowski@...sung.com, tony@...mide.com
Cc:     vdumpa@...dia.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tomi.valkeinen@...com,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, sre@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "dma-contiguous: do not allocate a single page
 from CMA area"

On 2019-02-26 8:23 pm, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> This reverts commit d222e42e88168fd67e6d131984b86477af1fc256.
> 
> The original change breaks omap dss:
>      omapdss_dispc 58001000.dispc:
>          dispc_errata_i734_wa_init: dma_alloc_writecombine failed
> 
> Let's revert it first and then find a safer solution instead.

Ah, I think I see the problem - once arch/arm's __dma_alloc() has 
decided to use CMA (because dev_get_cma_area(dev) returns the global 
area), it then won't fall back to trying a regular page allocation if 
dma_alloc_from_contiguous() returns NULL. Thus anything on 32-bit Arm 
trying to allocate a single-page buffer in blockable context with a 
CMA-enabled config is just going to fail. Similarly, it looks like none 
of the DMA_ATTR_FORCE_CONTIGUOUS cases are prepared to handle this 
change either (amd_iommu appears technically affected, but is already 
using dma_alloc_from_contiguous() backwards compared to everyone else, hmm).

I guess the question is whether to add alloc_page()/free_page() 
fallbacks to those call sites, or stuff them directly into the CMA 
helpers here.

Robin.

> Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
> ---
> Tony,
> 	
> Would you please test and verify? Thanks!
> 
>   kernel/dma/contiguous.c | 22 +++-------------------
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> index 09074bd04793..b2a87905846d 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/contiguous.c
> @@ -186,32 +186,16 @@ int __init dma_contiguous_reserve_area(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t base,
>    *
>    * This function allocates memory buffer for specified device. It uses
>    * device specific contiguous memory area if available or the default
> - * global one.
> - *
> - * However, it skips one-page size of allocations from the global area.
> - * As the addresses within one page are always contiguous, so there is
> - * no need to waste CMA pages for that kind; it also helps reduce the
> - * fragmentations in the CMA area. So a caller should be the rebounder
> - * in such case to allocate a normal page upon NULL return value.
> - *
> - * Requires architecture specific dev_get_cma_area() helper function.
> + * global one. Requires architecture specific dev_get_cma_area() helper
> + * function.
>    */
>   struct page *dma_alloc_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, size_t count,
>   				       unsigned int align, bool no_warn)
>   {
> -	struct cma *cma;
> -
>   	if (align > CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT)
>   		align = CONFIG_CMA_ALIGNMENT;
>   
> -	if (dev && dev->cma_area)
> -		cma = dev->cma_area;
> -	else if (count > 1)
> -		cma = dma_contiguous_default_area;
> -	else
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return cma_alloc(cma, count, align, no_warn);
> +	return cma_alloc(dev_get_cma_area(dev), count, align, no_warn);
>   }
>   
>   /**
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ