[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155125501739.293431.5252197504404771496.stgit@buzz>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:10:17 +0300
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sched/rt: check integer overflow at usec to nsec
conversion
Example of unhandled overflows:
# echo 18446744073709651 > cpu.rt_runtime_us
# cat cpu.rt_runtime_us
99
# echo 18446744073709900 > cpu.rt_period_us
# cat cpu.rt_period_us
348
After this patch they will fail with -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index e4f398ad9e73..aa7ee3a0bf90 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -2555,6 +2555,8 @@ int sched_group_set_rt_runtime(struct task_group *tg, long rt_runtime_us)
rt_runtime = (u64)rt_runtime_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
if (rt_runtime_us < 0)
rt_runtime = RUNTIME_INF;
+ else if ((u64)rt_runtime_us > U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
return tg_set_rt_bandwidth(tg, rt_period, rt_runtime);
}
@@ -2575,6 +2577,9 @@ int sched_group_set_rt_period(struct task_group *tg, u64 rt_period_us)
{
u64 rt_runtime, rt_period;
+ if (rt_period_us > U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
rt_period = rt_period_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
rt_runtime = tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_runtime;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists