[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155125502079.293431.3947497929372138600.stgit@buzz>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:10:20 +0300
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sched/core: check quota and period overflow at usec to
nsec conversion
Large values could overflow u64 and pass following sanity checks.
# echo 18446744073750000 > cpu.cfs_period_us
# cat cpu.cfs_period_us
40448
# echo 18446744073750000 > cpu.cfs_quota_us
# cat cpu.cfs_quota_us
40448
After this patch they will fail with -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index a626fbd9fdc7..5f46aa335b28 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6606,8 +6606,10 @@ int tg_set_cfs_quota(struct task_group *tg, long cfs_quota_us)
period = ktime_to_ns(tg->cfs_bandwidth.period);
if (cfs_quota_us < 0)
quota = RUNTIME_INF;
- else
+ else if ((u64)cfs_quota_us <= U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
quota = (u64)cfs_quota_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
return tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(tg, period, quota);
}
@@ -6629,6 +6631,9 @@ int tg_set_cfs_period(struct task_group *tg, long cfs_period_us)
{
u64 quota, period;
+ if ((u64)cfs_period_us > U64_MAX / NSEC_PER_USEC)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
period = (u64)cfs_period_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
quota = tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists