lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:30:27 +0000
From:   Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the iommu tree

On 27/02/2019 04:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the vhost tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/iommu/Kconfig
>   drivers/iommu/Makefile
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   004240dcc222 ("iommu/hyper-v: Add Hyper-V stub IOMMU driver")
> 
> from the iommu tree and commit:
> 
>   d906f4225497 ("iommu: Add virtio-iommu driver")
> 
> from the vhost tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks Stephen, sorry about the extra work. The virtio-iommu driver was
helpfully added to the vhost tree to ensure it doesn't break anything,
but since Joerg has some reservations, only the hyper-v change will be
merged in v5.1. I'd welcome a change of heart however, in which case the
driver should probably go via the iommu tree to avoid conflicts.

Thanks,
Jean

Powered by blists - more mailing lists