linux-kernel - Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: use __ATTR_RO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190227085442-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:54:58 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...hat.com>,
        qemu-devel@...gnu.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, somlo@....edu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: use __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev
 sysfs

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:07:16AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:45:46PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >Hi Wei,
> >
> >On 2/26/19 8:31 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> Leverage __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev sysfs instead of using open code
> >> to define the attribute.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 13 ++++---------
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> >> index 039e0f91dba8..a1293cbd7adb 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
> >> @@ -296,18 +296,13 @@ static int fw_cfg_do_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -static ssize_t fw_cfg_showrev(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf)
> >> +static ssize_t fw_cfg_rev_show(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *a,
> >> +			       char *buf)
> >>  {
> >>  	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", fw_cfg_rev);
> >>  }
> >> -
> >> -static const struct {
> >> -	struct attribute attr;
> >> -	ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf);
> >> -} fw_cfg_rev_attr = {
> >> -	.attr = { .name = "rev", .mode = S_IRUSR },
> >> -	.show = fw_cfg_showrev,
> >> -};
> >> +static const struct kobj_attribute fw_cfg_rev_attr =
> >> +	__ATTR_RO_MODE(fw_cfg_rev, 0400);
> >
> >Why not keep S_IRUSR?
> >
> 
> Because scripts/checkpatch.pl suggest not use S_IRUSR :-)
> 
> I am not sure about the particular reason.

Oh yea.

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFw5v23T-zvDZp-MmD_EYxF8WbafwwB59934FV7g21uMGQ@mail.gmail.com

maybe mention this in the commit log.

> >>  
> >>  /* fw_cfg_sysfs_entry type */
> >>  struct fw_cfg_sysfs_entry {
> >> 
> 
> -- 
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me