[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16f0ac6227f948165b7062a72e1fa82f1dfe4697.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:24:51 -0500
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shamir Rabinovitch <shamir.rabinovitch@...cle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree
On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 11:25 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/Kconfig
>
> between commit:
>
> 6fa8f1afd337 ("IB/{core,uverbs}: Move ib_umem_xxx functions from ib_core to ib_uverbs")
>
> from the rdma tree and commit:
>
> f4b6bcc7002f ("net: devlink: turn devlink into a built-in")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen, we'll add it to the (largish this release) list of
conflicts to bring to Linus' attention.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists