linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] net: Remove switchdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 20:18:37 +0000
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE" <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] net: Remove switchdev_ops

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:44:24AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch series completes the removal of the switchdev_ops by
> converting switchdev_port_attr_set() to use either the blocking
> (process) or non-blocking (atomic) notifier since we typically need to
> deal with both depending on where in the bridge code we get called from.
> 
> This was tested with the forwarding selftests and DSA hardware.

I ran some basic tests and nothing exploded :) Thanks, Florian!