[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM5PR0402MB2865656822F6CA28AF9E50E5F1740@AM5PR0402MB2865.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 02:35:15 +0000
From: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Yang Li <pku.leo@...il.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: dwc3: Add avoiding vbus glitch happen during
xhci reset
Hi Rob,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 00:40
> To: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Yang Li
> <pku.leo@...il.com>; linux-usb@...r.kernel.org; devicetree@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] usb: dwc3: Add avoiding vbus glitch happen during
> xhci reset
>
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 06:59:21 +0000, Ran Wang wrote:
> > When DWC3 is set to host mode by programming register DWC3_GCTL, VBUS
> > (or its control signal) will turn on immediately on related Root Hub
> > ports. Then the VBUS will be de-asserted for a little while during
> > xhci reset (conducted by xhci driver) for a little while and back to normal.
> >
> > This VBUS glitch might cause some USB devices emuration fail if kernel
> > boot with them connected. One SW workaround which can fix this is to
> > program all PORTSC[PP] to 0 to turn off VBUS immediately after setting
> > host mode in DWC3 driver(per signal measurement result, it will be too
> > late to do it in xhci-plat.c or xhci.c).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - None
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Correct typos
> > - Shorten the name to snps,host-vbus-glitches
> >
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/dwc3.txt | 3 +++
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
Got it, thanks for telling me this. So if I need to update patch 2/2 in next version,
I still need to attach this 1/2 patch with adding tag 'Reviewed-by' to it, am I right?
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
OK
Regards,
Ran
Powered by blists - more mailing lists