[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190227030715.GA5449@richard>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:07:16 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, somlo@....edu, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fw_cfg: use __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev
sysfs
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 07:45:46PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>On 2/26/19 8:31 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> Leverage __ATTR_RO_MODE to define rev sysfs instead of using open code
>> to define the attribute.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c | 13 ++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
>> index 039e0f91dba8..a1293cbd7adb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg.c
>> @@ -296,18 +296,13 @@ static int fw_cfg_do_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t fw_cfg_showrev(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t fw_cfg_rev_show(struct kobject *k, struct kobj_attribute *a,
>> + char *buf)
>> {
>> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", fw_cfg_rev);
>> }
>> -
>> -static const struct {
>> - struct attribute attr;
>> - ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *k, struct attribute *a, char *buf);
>> -} fw_cfg_rev_attr = {
>> - .attr = { .name = "rev", .mode = S_IRUSR },
>> - .show = fw_cfg_showrev,
>> -};
>> +static const struct kobj_attribute fw_cfg_rev_attr =
>> + __ATTR_RO_MODE(fw_cfg_rev, 0400);
>
>Why not keep S_IRUSR?
>
Because scripts/checkpatch.pl suggest not use S_IRUSR :-)
I am not sure about the particular reason.
>>
>> /* fw_cfg_sysfs_entry type */
>> struct fw_cfg_sysfs_entry {
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Powered by blists - more mailing lists