lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:59:19 -0800 From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, atish patra <atishp04@...il.com>, Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>, "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kselftest <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org, Manoj Rao <linux@...ojrajarao.com>, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to extend the kernel On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:45 AM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:37:41AM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > In any case, it is not practical to provide headers for every kernel version on > > the system image and maintain them, it will take up too much space and has to > > be periodically packaged. Not to mention that there will be kernel versions > > that are booting Android that simply don't have anyone maintaining headers > > for. So the proposed solution is an easier path. > > I totally agree with this, and with your proposed patches, just wanting > to clear up some potential anti-GPL-FUD before it got spread any further :) Sure, no problem, thanks :) - Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists