[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190228171506.GC226495@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:15:07 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: Add workaround for Fujitsu A64FX erratum 010001
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 06:43:41PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> From: Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
>
> On the Fujitsu-A64FX cores ver(1.0, 1.1), memory access may cause
> an undefined fault (Data abort, DFSC=0b111111). This fault occurs under
> a specific hardware condition when a load/store instruction performs an
> address translation. Any load/store instruction, except non-fault access
> including Armv8 and SVE might cause this undefined fault.
>
> The TCR_ELx.NFD1 bit is used by the kernel when CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE
> is enabled to mitigate timing attacks against KASLR where the kernel
> address space could be probed using the FFR and suppressed fault on
> SVE loads.
>
> Since this erratum causes spurious exceptions, which may corrupt
> the exception registers, we clear the TCR_ELx.NFDx=1 bits when
> booting on an affected CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
> [Generated MIDR value/mask for __cpu_setup(), removed spurious-fault handler
> and always disabled the NFDx bits on affected CPUs]
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Tested-by: zhang.lei <zhang.lei@...fujitsu.com>
Queued for 5.1. Thanks.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists