linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190228173758.GD226495@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 17:37:58 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andrew.murray@....com, arnd@...db.de, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        palmer@...ive.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure inX() is ordered wrt delay() routines

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 06:04:51PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> Will Deacon (3):
>   asm-generic/io: Pass result of I/O accessor to __io_[p]ar()
>   riscv: io: Update __io_[p]ar() macros to take an argument
>   arm64: io: Hook up __io_par() for inX() ordering

Since we have the acks in place, I plan to queue these patches via the
arm64 tree. They don't conflict with -next (as of today) but if anyone
expects other issues, please let me know.

-- 
Catalin