[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1551389037.6059.3.camel@impinj.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 21:23:58 +0000
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...inj.com>
To: "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
CC: "linux-imx@....com" <linux-imx@....com>,
"hongxing.zhu@....com" <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
"cphealy@...il.com" <cphealy@...il.com>,
"aisheng.dong@....com" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"fabio.estevam@....com" <fabio.estevam@....com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"leonard.crestez@....com" <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: imx6: Add code to request/control "pcie_aux"
clock for i.MX8MQ
On Tue, 2019-02-12 at 10:36 +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Montag, den 11.02.2019, 17:51 -0800 schrieb Andrey Smirnov:
> > PCIe IP block has additional clock, "pcie_aux", that needs to be
> > controlled by the driver. Add code to support that.
This breaks iMX7d.
> >
> > @@ -1049,6 +1059,12 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PCIE APPS reset control\n");
> > return PTR_ERR(imx6_pcie->apps_reset);
> > }
> > +
> > + imx6_pcie->pcie_aux = devm_clk_get(dev, "pcie_aux");
> > + if (IS_ERR(imx6_pcie->pcie_aux)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "pcie_aux clock source missing or invalid\n");
> > + return PTR_ERR(imx6_pcie->pcie_aux);
> > + }
> > break;
> > default:
> > break;
One can't see enough context in the patch above, but in linux-next this
section is under
case IMX7D:
case IMX8MQ:
It's being applied to imx7d and not just imx8mq and so breaks because
imx7d dts files don't have this clock. Not sure if this is a bug in
this commit or some kind of merge/rebase mistake.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists