| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-3c0cd952cf051903929cd57b89034cc5f71f451d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 23:49:48 -0800
From: tip-bot for Adrian Hunter <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf thread-stack: Hide x86 retpolines
Commit-ID: 3c0cd952cf051903929cd57b89034cc5f71f451d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/3c0cd952cf051903929cd57b89034cc5f71f451d
Author: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 11:18:35 +0200
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:49:49 -0300
perf thread-stack: Hide x86 retpolines
x86 retpoline functions pollute the call graph by showing up everywhere
there is an indirect branch, but they do not really mean anything. Make
changes so that the default retpoline functions will no longer appear in
the call graph. Note this only affects the call graph, since all the
original branches are left unchanged.
This does not handle function return thunks, nor is there any
improvement for the handling of inline thunks or extern thunks.
Example:
$ cat simple-retpoline.c
__attribute__((noinline)) int bar(void)
{
return -1;
}
int foo(void)
{
return bar() + 1;
}
__attribute__((indirect_branch("thunk"))) int main()
{
int (*volatile fn)(void) = foo;
fn();
return fn();
}
$ gcc -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -O2 -o simple-retpoline simple-retpoline.c
$ objdump -d simple-retpoline
<SNIP>
0000000000001040 <main>:
1040: 48 83 ec 18 sub $0x18,%rsp
1044: 48 8d 05 25 01 00 00 lea 0x125(%rip),%rax # 1170 <foo>
104b: 48 89 44 24 08 mov %rax,0x8(%rsp)
1050: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
1055: e8 1f 01 00 00 callq 1179 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rax>
105a: 48 8b 44 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%rax
105f: 48 83 c4 18 add $0x18,%rsp
1063: e9 11 01 00 00 jmpq 1179 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rax>
<SNIP>
0000000000001160 <bar>:
1160: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax
1165: c3 retq
<SNIP>
0000000000001170 <foo>:
1170: e8 eb ff ff ff callq 1160 <bar>
1175: 83 c0 01 add $0x1,%eax
1178: c3 retq
0000000000001179 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rax>:
1179: e8 07 00 00 00 callq 1185 <__x86_indirect_thunk_rax+0xc>
117e: f3 90 pause
1180: 0f ae e8 lfence
1183: eb f9 jmp 117e <__x86_indirect_thunk_rax+0x5>
1185: 48 89 04 24 mov %rax,(%rsp)
1189: c3 retq
<SNIP>
$ perf record -o simple-retpoline.perf.data -e intel_pt/cyc/u ./simple-retpoline
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0,017 MB simple-retpoline.perf.data ]
$ perf script -i simple-retpoline.perf.data --itrace=be -s ~/libexec/perf-core/scripts/python/export-to-sqlite.py simple-retpoline.db branches calls
2019-01-08 14:03:37.851655 Creating database...
2019-01-08 14:03:37.863256 Writing records...
2019-01-08 14:03:38.069750 Adding indexes
2019-01-08 14:03:38.078799 Done
$ ~/libexec/perf-core/scripts/python/exported-sql-viewer.py simple-retpoline.db
Before:
main
-> __x86_indirect_thunk_rax
-> __x86_indirect_thunk_rax
-> foo
-> bar
After:
main
-> foo
-> bar
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190109091835.5570-7-adrian.hunter@intel.com
[ Remove (sym->name != NULL) test, this is not a pointer and breaks the build with clang version 7.0.1 (Fedora 7.0.1-2.fc30) ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c b/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
index 632c07a125ab..a8b45168513c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/thread-stack.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "thread.h"
#include "event.h"
#include "machine.h"
+#include "env.h"
#include "util.h"
#include "debug.h"
#include "symbol.h"
@@ -29,6 +30,19 @@
#define STACK_GROWTH 2048
+/*
+ * State of retpoline detection.
+ *
+ * RETPOLINE_NONE: no retpoline detection
+ * X86_RETPOLINE_POSSIBLE: x86 retpoline possible
+ * X86_RETPOLINE_DETECTED: x86 retpoline detected
+ */
+enum retpoline_state_t {
+ RETPOLINE_NONE,
+ X86_RETPOLINE_POSSIBLE,
+ X86_RETPOLINE_DETECTED,
+};
+
/**
* struct thread_stack_entry - thread stack entry.
* @ret_addr: return address
@@ -64,6 +78,7 @@ struct thread_stack_entry {
* @crp: call/return processor
* @comm: current comm
* @arr_sz: size of array if this is the first element of an array
+ * @rstate: used to detect retpolines
*/
struct thread_stack {
struct thread_stack_entry *stack;
@@ -76,6 +91,7 @@ struct thread_stack {
struct call_return_processor *crp;
struct comm *comm;
unsigned int arr_sz;
+ enum retpoline_state_t rstate;
};
/*
@@ -115,10 +131,16 @@ static int thread_stack__init(struct thread_stack *ts, struct thread *thread,
if (err)
return err;
- if (thread->mg && thread->mg->machine)
- ts->kernel_start = machine__kernel_start(thread->mg->machine);
- else
+ if (thread->mg && thread->mg->machine) {
+ struct machine *machine = thread->mg->machine;
+ const char *arch = perf_env__arch(machine->env);
+
+ ts->kernel_start = machine__kernel_start(machine);
+ if (!strcmp(arch, "x86"))
+ ts->rstate = X86_RETPOLINE_POSSIBLE;
+ } else {
ts->kernel_start = 1ULL << 63;
+ }
ts->crp = crp;
return 0;
@@ -733,6 +755,70 @@ static int thread_stack__trace_end(struct thread_stack *ts,
false, true);
}
+static bool is_x86_retpoline(const char *name)
+{
+ const char *p = strstr(name, "__x86_indirect_thunk_");
+
+ return p == name || !strcmp(name, "__indirect_thunk_start");
+}
+
+/*
+ * x86 retpoline functions pollute the call graph. This function removes them.
+ * This does not handle function return thunks, nor is there any improvement
+ * for the handling of inline thunks or extern thunks.
+ */
+static int thread_stack__x86_retpoline(struct thread_stack *ts,
+ struct perf_sample *sample,
+ struct addr_location *to_al)
+{
+ struct thread_stack_entry *tse = &ts->stack[ts->cnt - 1];
+ struct call_path_root *cpr = ts->crp->cpr;
+ struct symbol *sym = tse->cp->sym;
+ struct symbol *tsym = to_al->sym;
+ struct call_path *cp;
+
+ if (sym && is_x86_retpoline(sym->name)) {
+ /*
+ * This is a x86 retpoline fn. It pollutes the call graph by
+ * showing up everywhere there is an indirect branch, but does
+ * not itself mean anything. Here the top-of-stack is removed,
+ * by decrementing the stack count, and then further down, the
+ * resulting top-of-stack is replaced with the actual target.
+ * The result is that the retpoline functions will no longer
+ * appear in the call graph. Note this only affects the call
+ * graph, since all the original branches are left unchanged.
+ */
+ ts->cnt -= 1;
+ sym = ts->stack[ts->cnt - 2].cp->sym;
+ if (sym && sym == tsym && to_al->addr != tsym->start) {
+ /*
+ * Target is back to the middle of the symbol we came
+ * from so assume it is an indirect jmp and forget it
+ * altogether.
+ */
+ ts->cnt -= 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ } else if (sym && sym == tsym) {
+ /*
+ * Target is back to the symbol we came from so assume it is an
+ * indirect jmp and forget it altogether.
+ */
+ ts->cnt -= 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ cp = call_path__findnew(cpr, ts->stack[ts->cnt - 2].cp, tsym,
+ sample->addr, ts->kernel_start);
+ if (!cp)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ /* Replace the top-of-stack with the actual target */
+ ts->stack[ts->cnt - 1].cp = cp;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
int thread_stack__process(struct thread *thread, struct comm *comm,
struct perf_sample *sample,
struct addr_location *from_al,
@@ -740,6 +826,7 @@ int thread_stack__process(struct thread *thread, struct comm *comm,
struct call_return_processor *crp)
{
struct thread_stack *ts = thread__stack(thread, sample->cpu);
+ enum retpoline_state_t rstate;
int err = 0;
if (ts && !ts->crp) {
@@ -755,6 +842,10 @@ int thread_stack__process(struct thread *thread, struct comm *comm,
ts->comm = comm;
}
+ rstate = ts->rstate;
+ if (rstate == X86_RETPOLINE_DETECTED)
+ ts->rstate = X86_RETPOLINE_POSSIBLE;
+
/* Flush stack on exec */
if (ts->comm != comm && thread->pid_ == thread->tid) {
err = __thread_stack__flush(thread, ts);
@@ -791,10 +882,25 @@ int thread_stack__process(struct thread *thread, struct comm *comm,
ts->kernel_start);
err = thread_stack__push_cp(ts, ret_addr, sample->time, ref,
cp, false, trace_end);
+
+ /*
+ * A call to the same symbol but not the start of the symbol,
+ * may be the start of a x86 retpoline.
+ */
+ if (!err && rstate == X86_RETPOLINE_POSSIBLE && to_al->sym &&
+ from_al->sym == to_al->sym &&
+ to_al->addr != to_al->sym->start)
+ ts->rstate = X86_RETPOLINE_DETECTED;
+
} else if (sample->flags & PERF_IP_FLAG_RETURN) {
if (!sample->ip || !sample->addr)
return 0;
+ /* x86 retpoline 'return' doesn't match the stack */
+ if (rstate == X86_RETPOLINE_DETECTED && ts->cnt > 2 &&
+ ts->stack[ts->cnt - 1].ret_addr != sample->addr)
+ return thread_stack__x86_retpoline(ts, sample, to_al);
+
err = thread_stack__pop_cp(thread, ts, sample->addr,
sample->time, ref, from_al->sym);
if (err) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists