linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the iommu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:04:42 +0100
From:   Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lan Tianyu <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the iommu tree

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 08:58:36AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Even though it's not going into 5.1 I feel it's helpful to keep it in
> the vhost tree until the next cycle, it helps make sure unrelated
> changes don't break it.

It is not going to 5.1, so it shouldn't be in linux-next, no? And when
it is going upstream, it should do so through the iommu tree. If you
keep it separatly in the vhost tree for testing purposes, please make
sure it is not included into your linux-next branch.

Regards,

	Joerg