[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190228113303.GE9565@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:33:03 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: remove zone_lru_lock() function access
->lru_lock directly
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:33:27AM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> We have common pattern to access lru_lock from a page pointer:
> zone_lru_lock(page_zone(page))
>
> Which is silly, because it unfolds to this:
> &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->node_zones[page_zonenum(page)]->zone_pgdat->lru_lock
> while we can simply do
> &NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(page))->lru_lock
>
> Remove zone_lru_lock() function, since it's only complicate things.
> Use 'page_pgdat(page)->lru_lock' pattern instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists