lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <2452a0b6-a90e-52b8-cb9f-0b5a7fafbe64@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:02:53 +0530
From:   "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...nel.org>,
        "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/dax: Don't enable huge dax mapping by default

On 2/28/19 3:10 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 28-02-19 14:05:22, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Add a flag to indicate the ability to do huge page dax mapping. On architecture
>> like ppc64, the hypervisor can disable huge page support in the guest. In
>> such a case, we should not enable huge page dax mapping. This patch adds
>> a flag which the architecture code will update to indicate huge page
>> dax mapping support.
>>
>> Architectures mostly do transparent_hugepage_flag = 0; if they can't
>> do hugepages. That also takes care of disabling dax hugepage mapping
>> with this change.
>>
>> Without this patch we get the below error with kvm on ppc64.
>>
>> [  118.849975] lpar: Failed hash pte insert with error -4
>>
>> NOTE: The patch also use
>>
>> echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled
>> to disable dax huge page mapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>
> 
> Added Dan to CC for opinion. I kind of fail to see why you don't use
> TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_FLAG for this. I know that technically DAX huge pages
> and normal THPs are different things but so far we've tried to avoid making
> that distinction visible to userspace.


I would also like to use the same flag. Was not sure whether it was ok. 
In fact that is one of the reason I hooked this to 
/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled. If we are ok with using 
same flag, we can kill the vma_is_dax() check completely.


-aneesh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ