linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] mm: Add generic p?d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190301115300.GE5156@rapoport-lnx>
Date:   Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:53:01 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] mm: Add generic p?d_large() macros

Him Kirill,

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:06:18AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 05:16:46PM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
> > >> Note that in terms of the new page walking code, these new defines are
> > >> only used when walking a page table without a VMA (which isn't currently
> > >> done), so architectures which don't use p?d_large currently will work
> > >> fine with the generic versions. They only need to provide meaningful
> > >> definitions when switching to use the walk-without-a-VMA functionality.
> > > 
> > > How other architectures would know that they need to provide the helpers
> > > to get walk-without-a-VMA functionality? This looks very fragile to me.
> > 
> > Yes, you've got a good point there. This would apply to the p?d_large
> > macros as well - any arch which (inadvertently) uses the generic version
> > is likely to be fragile/broken.
> > 
> > I think probably the best option here is to scrap the generic versions
> > altogether and simply introduce a ARCH_HAS_PXD_LARGE config option which
> > would enable the new functionality to those arches that opt-in. Do you
> > think this would be less fragile?
> 
> These helpers are useful beyond pagewalker.
> 
> Can we actually do some grinding and make *all* archs to provide correct
> helpers? Yes, it's tedious, but not that bad.

Many architectures simply cannot support non-leaf entries at the higher
levels. I think letting the use a generic helper actually does make sense.
 
> I think we could provide generic helpers for folded levels in
> <asm-generic/pgtable-nop?d.h> and rest has to be provided by the arch.
> Architectures that support only 2 level paging would need to provide
> pgd_large(), with 3 -- pmd_large() and so on.
> 
> -- 
>  Kirill A. Shutemov

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.