[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190301152547.GA25732@rei>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:25:48 +0100
From: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
hughd@...gle.com, kirill@...temov.name, joel@...lfernandes.org,
jglisse@...hat.com, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com,
mgorman@...hsingularity.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,mremap: Bail out earlier in mremap_to under map
pressure
Hi!
> Hopefully the only program that would start failing would be a LTP test
> testing the current behavior near the limit (if such test exists). And
> that can be adjusted.
There does not seem to be a mremap() test that would do such a thing, so
we should be safe :-).
BTW there was a similar fix for mmap() with MAP_FIXED that caused a LTP
test to fail and was fixed in:
commit e8420a8ece80b3fe810415ecf061d54ca7fab266
Author: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@...e.cz>
Date: Mon Apr 29 15:08:33 2013 -0700
mm/mmap: check for RLIMIT_AS before unmapping
And I haven't heard of any breakages so far so I guess that this very
similar situation and that the possibility of breaking real world
applications here is really low.
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@...e.cz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists