[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiB2gRa8tsa3ndxgyTe0FZ+M40oe_ffW8jCoAu_KjQgHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:17:57 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>, valentin.schneider@....com,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] i915,uaccess: Fix redundant CLAC
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:35 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> With the dodgy patch:
>
> CC drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: eb_relocate_slow()+0x1f9: call to kvfree() with UACCESS enabled
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl()+0x315: call to kvfree() with UACCESS enabled
Ok, so it looks like your patch does the right thing. Your fixups to
i915_gem_execbuffer.c (and the already commented-upon copy_user_tail
thing) also look sane.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists