[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1551480042.1526.0@crapouillou.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 19:40:42 -0300
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: Add doc for the ingenic-drm driver
Hi Sam, thanks for the feedback.
Le ven. 1 mars 2019 à 17:16, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> a écrit :
> Hi Paul.
>
> Good to see work migrating fbdev => drm.
>
> Following comments is based on experience while working on migrating
> another driver from fbdev => drm.
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 07:07:54PM -0300, Paul Cercueil wrote:
>> Add documentation for the devicetree bindings of the DRM driver for
>> the
>> JZ47xx family of SoCs from Ingenic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>> Tested-by: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,drm.txt | 30
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,drm.txt
>>
>> diff --git
>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,drm.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,drm.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..52a368ec35cd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ingenic,drm.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> +Ingenic JZ47xx DRM driver
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: one of:
>> + * ingenic,jz4740-drm
>> + * ingenic,jz4725b-drm
>> +- reg: LCD registers location and length
> The fbdev way of doing this was to hardcode register setttings.
> In the drm world we read the configuration of the panel and let
> this decide the actual configuration.
>
> Note that no drm drivers supports stn displays and that there
> is really no use for this these days. So you can skip the STN parts.
STN panels aren't really my problem; but I have a board with a Sharp
LS020B1DD01D panel, which requires the LCD IP to be configured for a
"special 2" panel. I also have a board with a "smart" panel (ili9331)
that needs a special configuration in the IP. There is nothing in
the drm_panel interface that tells me what mode I should use for what
panel...
> Also the modern way to specify a panel in the DT is using OF graph
> bindings.
> You can find many examples how to do this.
Ok, I was looking at the Tegra driver, which uses a "nvidia,panel" DT
property. I will change it to use the graph thing.
> I was there with the atmel LCDC driver (not in the kernel yet),
> and had some challenges with this.
>
> Sam
Thanks,
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists