[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190302233413.14813-15-paul@crapouillou.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 20:34:00 -0300
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>, od@...c.me,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Subject: [PATCH v10 14/27] pwm: jz4740: Improve algorithm of clock calculation
The previous algorithm hardcoded details about how the TCU clocks work.
The new algorithm will use clk_round_rate to find the perfect clock rate
for the PWM channel.
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Tested-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@...ian.org>
Tested-by: Artur Rojek <contact@...ur-rojek.eu>
---
Notes:
v9: New patch
v10: - New algorithm. Instead of starting with the maximum clock rate
and using clk_round_rate(rate - 1) to get the next (smaller)
clock, we compute the maximum rate we can use before the
register overflows, and apply it with clk_set_max_rate.
Then we read the new clock rate and compute the register values
of the period and duty from that.
- Use NSEC_PER_SEC instead of magic 1000000000 value
drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
index c6136bd4434b..f497388fc818 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
@@ -110,24 +110,45 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct jz4740_pwm_chip *jz4740 = to_jz4740(pwm->chip);
struct clk *clk = jz4740->clks[pwm->hwpwm],
*parent_clk = clk_get_parent(clk);
- unsigned long rate, period, duty;
+ unsigned long rate, parent_rate, period, duty;
unsigned long long tmp;
- unsigned int prescaler = 0;
+ int ret;
- rate = clk_get_rate(parent_clk);
- tmp = (unsigned long long)rate * state->period;
- do_div(tmp, 1000000000);
- period = tmp;
+ parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent_clk);
+
+ jz4740_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
+
+ /* Reset the clock to the maximum rate, and we'll reduce it if needed */
+ ret = clk_set_rate(clk, parent_rate);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
- while (period > 0xffff && prescaler < 6) {
- period >>= 2;
- rate >>= 2;
- ++prescaler;
+ /* Limit the clock to a maximum rate that still gives us a period value
+ * which fits in 16 bits.
+ */
+ tmp = 0xffffull * NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ do_div(tmp, state->period);
+
+ ret = clk_set_max_rate(clk, tmp);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(chip->dev, "Unable to set max rate: %i\n", ret);
+ return ret;
}
- if (prescaler == 6)
- return -EINVAL;
+ /* Read back the clock rate, as it may have been modified by
+ * clk_set_max_rate()
+ */
+ rate = clk_get_rate(clk);
+ if (rate != parent_rate)
+ dev_dbg(chip->dev, "PWM clock updated to %lu Hz\n", rate);
+
+ /* Calculate period value */
+ tmp = (unsigned long long)rate * state->period;
+ do_div(tmp, NSEC_PER_SEC);
+ period = (unsigned long)tmp;
+
+ /* Calculate duty value */
tmp = (unsigned long long)period * state->duty_cycle;
do_div(tmp, state->period);
duty = period - tmp;
@@ -135,14 +156,10 @@ static int jz4740_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (duty >= period)
duty = period - 1;
- jz4740_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
-
/* Set abrupt shutdown */
regmap_update_bits(jz4740->map, TCU_REG_TCSRc(pwm->hwpwm),
TCU_TCSR_PWM_SD, TCU_TCSR_PWM_SD);
- clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
-
/* Reset counter to 0 */
regmap_write(jz4740->map, TCU_REG_TCNTc(pwm->hwpwm), 0);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists