[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 10:19:40 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, tj@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] workqueue: fix a memory leak in wq->lock_name
On 3/3/19 6:34 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 497900263dbc..e780bf73eced 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3445,6 +3445,8 @@ static void wq_init_lockdep(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
> lock_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s%s", "(wq_completion)", wq->name);
> if (!lock_name)
> lock_name = wq->name;
> +
> + wq->lock_name = lock_name;
> lockdep_init_map(&wq->lockdep_map, lock_name, &wq->key, 0);
> }
Not sure how this got overlooked. Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists