[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:01:09 -0300
From: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com>
To: "Ardelean, Alexandru" <Alex.Ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: "lars@...afoo.de" <lars@...afoo.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Popa, Stefan Serban" <StefanSerban.Popa@...log.com>,
"knaack.h@....de" <knaack.h@....de>,
"jic23@...nel.org" <jic23@...nel.org>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
"renatogeh@...il.com" <renatogeh@...il.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"giuliano.belinassi@....br" <giuliano.belinassi@....br>,
"pmeerw@...erw.net" <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"kernel-usp@...glegroups.com" <kernel-usp@...glegroups.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] staging:iio:ad7780: add chip ID values and mask
On 03/01, Ardelean, Alexandru wrote:
>On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 11:24 -0300, Renato Lui Geh wrote:
>>
>>
>> The ad7780 supports both the ad778x and ad717x families. Each chip has
>> a corresponding ID. This patch provides a mask for extracting ID values
>> from the status bits and also macros for the correct values for the
>> ad7170, ad7171, ad7780 and ad7781.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> index 56c49e28f432..ad7617a3a141 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/ad7780.c
>> @@ -26,10 +26,14 @@
>> #define AD7780_RDY BIT(7)
>> #define AD7780_FILTER BIT(6)
>> #define AD7780_ERR BIT(5)
>> -#define AD7780_ID1 BIT(4)
>> -#define AD7780_ID0 BIT(3)
>> #define AD7780_GAIN BIT(2)
>>
>> +#define AD7170_ID 0
>> +#define AD7171_ID 1
>> +#define AD7780_ID 1
>> +#define AD7781_ID 0
>> +
>> +#define AD7780_ID_MASK (BIT(3) | BIT(4))
>
>This also doesn't have any functionality change.
>The AD7170_ID, AD7171_ID, AD7780_ID & AD7781_ID IDs are also unused (maybe
>in a later patch they are ?).
They aren't. I added them following a previous review suggestion. Should
I remove them?
>
>I would also leave the AD7780_ID1 & AD7780_ID0 definitions in place, since
>they're easier matched with the datasheet.
>
>>
>> #define AD7780_PATTERN_GOOD 1
>> #define AD7780_PATTERN_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>> --
>> 2.21.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists