[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcjQjBV8xsuJyZ1RBnNQAV_k8z9Hp-3S_JnYDRpJZ2UXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 08:55:30 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>
Cc: liuyu712@...ilicon.com, USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Suzhuangluan <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
Kongfei <kongfei@...ilicon.com>, wanghu17@...ilicon.com,
butao@...ilicon.com, Yao Chen <chenyao11@...wei.com>,
fangshengzhou@...ilicon.com, lipengcheng8@...wei.com,
songxiaowei <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
xu yiping <xuyiping@...ilicon.com>, xuyoujun4@...wei.com,
yudongbin@...ilicon.com, zangleigang@...ilicon.com,
Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] hikey960: Support usb functionality of Hikey960
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:35 AM Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com> wrote:
> On 2019/3/3 0:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 11:05 AM Yu Chen <chenyu56@...wei.com> wrote:
> >> +config HISI_HIKEY_USB
> >> + tristate "USB functionality of HiSilicon Hikey Platform"
> >> + depends on OF && GPIOLIB
> >> + help
> >> + If you say yes here you get support for usb functionality of HiSilicon Hikey Platform.
> >
> >> +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > It's hard to see why this have
> > depends on OF followed by above header inclusion.
> >
> This driver depends on devicetree, so I add "depends on OF".
> But is seems that "#include <linux/of.h>" can be removed after "of_" API
> have been removed. Thanks for your reminder!
So, it means that technically there is no such dependency, rather
administratively.
> >> + hisi_hikey_usb->typec_vbus = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "typec-vbus",
> >> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> >
> >> + if (!hisi_hikey_usb->typec_vbus)
> >> + return -ENOENT;
> >
> > Hmm... Is it possible to get NULL pointer from gpiod_get() at all?
> >
> >> + if (!hisi_hikey_usb->otg_switch)
> >> + return -ENOENT;
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
> I check the comments of devm_gpio_get API, it will not return NULL pointer.
> But is it more safe to keep the NULL checking? What is your advice?
Why do we need dead code?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists