| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190304081626.315972549@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:22:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 18/78] selftests: rtc: rtctest: add alarm test on minute boundary
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 7b3027728f4d4f6763f4d7e771acfc9424cdd0e6 ]
Unfortunately, some RTC don't have a second resolution for alarm so also
test for alarm on a minute boundary.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 102 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
index dea4e3d6d9e18..b2065536d4075 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c
@@ -211,6 +211,108 @@ TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set) {
ASSERT_EQ(new, secs);
}
+TEST_F(rtc, alarm_alm_set_minute) {
+ struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = 62 };
+ unsigned long data;
+ struct rtc_time tm;
+ fd_set readfds;
+ time_t secs, new;
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ secs = timegm((struct tm *)&tm) + 60 - tm.tm_sec;
+ gmtime_r(&secs, (struct tm *)&tm);
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_SET, &tm);
+ if (rc == -1) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+ TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_ALM_READ, &tm);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ TH_LOG("Alarm time now set to %02d:%02d:%02d.",
+ tm.tm_hour, tm.tm_min, tm.tm_sec);
+
+ /* Enable alarm interrupts */
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_AIE_ON, 0);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ FD_ZERO(&readfds);
+ FD_SET(self->fd, &readfds);
+
+ rc = select(self->fd + 1, &readfds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+ ASSERT_NE(0, rc);
+
+ /* Disable alarm interrupts */
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_AIE_OFF, 0);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ rc = read(self->fd, &data, sizeof(unsigned long));
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+ TH_LOG("data: %lx", data);
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ new = timegm((struct tm *)&tm);
+ ASSERT_EQ(new, secs);
+}
+
+TEST_F(rtc, alarm_wkalm_set_minute) {
+ struct timeval tv = { .tv_sec = 62 };
+ struct rtc_wkalrm alarm = { 0 };
+ struct rtc_time tm;
+ unsigned long data;
+ fd_set readfds;
+ time_t secs, new;
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &alarm.time);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ secs = timegm((struct tm *)&alarm.time) + 60 - alarm.time.tm_sec;
+ gmtime_r(&secs, (struct tm *)&alarm.time);
+
+ alarm.enabled = 1;
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_SET, &alarm);
+ if (rc == -1) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(EINVAL, errno);
+ TH_LOG("skip alarms are not supported.");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_WKALM_RD, &alarm);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ TH_LOG("Alarm time now set to %02d/%02d/%02d %02d:%02d:%02d.",
+ alarm.time.tm_mday, alarm.time.tm_mon + 1,
+ alarm.time.tm_year + 1900, alarm.time.tm_hour,
+ alarm.time.tm_min, alarm.time.tm_sec);
+
+ FD_ZERO(&readfds);
+ FD_SET(self->fd, &readfds);
+
+ rc = select(self->fd + 1, &readfds, NULL, NULL, &tv);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+ ASSERT_NE(0, rc);
+
+ rc = read(self->fd, &data, sizeof(unsigned long));
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ rc = ioctl(self->fd, RTC_RD_TIME, &tm);
+ ASSERT_NE(-1, rc);
+
+ new = timegm((struct tm *)&tm);
+ ASSERT_EQ(new, secs);
+}
+
static void __attribute__((constructor))
__constructor_order_last(void)
{
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists